Exploring the impact of a co-designed shared book reading environment for families in a community hub.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports the effectiveness of shared book reading for promoting language and literacy development, but it is known that families experiencing vulnerability may have reduced access to books and are less likely to share books regularly at home. Community hubs often provide support to families experiencing vulnerability and may provide an opportunity to create environments that support families to engage in shared book reading, especially if families are invited into the creation of these environments through co-design. However, there is currently little evidence regarding the impact of co-designing shared book reading environments with families in community settings. AIMS: The current study is part of a broader project which used co-design to develop a shared book reading environment in collaboration with stakeholders in a community hub. This small-scale study aimed to provide a preliminary evaluation of the impact of this co-designed shared book reading environment at the community hub on (1) the frequency of shared book reading at the hub; (2) participants' confidence and enjoyment of reading with children at the hub; and (3) participants' experiences of shared book reading at the hub. METHOD & PROCEDURES: The co-design project was carried out in four phases with families, staff and community partners at the community hub. A convergent mixed-methods approach was used to collect and analyse quantitative and qualitative data in the first and last phase of the project to evaluate project outcomes. Quantitative data (environmental observations of reading at the hub and participant ratings of confidence and enjoyment of reading with children at the hub) were analysed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric statistical tests. Qualitative data (participants' responses regarding their experiences of changes implemented in the community hub) were analysed using inductive content analysis. OUTCOME & RESULTS: An increased frequency of shared book reading was observed within the community hub after changes were implemented, and positive changes in enjoyment of book reading were recorded. Qualitative responses from participants following conclusion of the project were organised into three main categories, which showed that (1) children and families were reading more and enjoying reading activities that were happening; (2) children and families were borrowing more books; and (3) families had changed the way they were reading at home with their children. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: A co-designed shared book reading environment within a community hub had a positive impact on shared book reading experiences for families in areas with high levels of vulnerability. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Community hubs provide a unique opportunity to support early language and literacy development in partnership with families in areas of vulnerability; however, there is limited literature investigating the impacts of these supports. A previous study utilised co-design to develop a shared book reading environment with stakeholders at a community hub in an area where a high proportion of children are considered to be 'vulnerable' in terms of language and literacy development. It was found that co-design enabled the development of collaborative changes to support shared book reading that were valued and owned by families, staff and community partners at the community hub. What this study adds The current study focused on evaluating the impact of a co-design project on the frequency of shared book reading at the hub and participants' experiences, confidence and enjoyment of reading with children at the hub. Analysis of pre- and post-data provide preliminary evidence that a co-designed shared book reading environment in a community hub can have a positive impact on increasing families' awareness and engagement with book borrowing, engagement in shared book reading activities in the community and at home, and participants' confidence and enjoyment of reading with children. What are the clinical implications of this work? Speech pathologists have an important role to play in prevention and promotion. This study has shown that collaboration with families experiencing vulnerability can support the implementation of strategies to promote shared reading in a community hub and demonstrate increased quality and frequency of shared book reading. The utilisation of a community hub also highlights the opportunities for the speech pathology profession to deliver community-based promotion and prevention initiatives as a strategy to address equitable language outcomes.

Interprofessional Practice Between Speech-Language Pathologists and Classroom Teachers: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: There is an important need for interprofessional practice (IPP) between speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and classroom teachers (CTs) in mainstream schools to support student outcomes. This mixed methods systematic review aimed to synthesize existing literature to describe the experiences of IPP between SLPs and CTs in mainstream schools. METHOD: A systematic review protocol was utilized to conduct a comprehensive search of six databases (PubMed Central, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL EBSCO, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) using key words related to the research question. A total of 1,876 unique studies were retrieved. Of these, 18 studies were identified as relevant to the research question, as they described the experiences of IPP between SLPs and CTs. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative studies. RESULTS: Six main themes describing IPP experiences were identified: (1) what are you bringing to the collaboration table? (2) putting the value in collaboration, (3) sharing is collaborating, (4) the nature of collaboration varies, (5) the educational context matters, and (6) influences to collaboration beyond professional control. CONCLUSIONS: IPP between SLPs and CTs is complex, with various facilitators and barriers to IPP emerging within the education context. Competencies for SLPs and CTs related to having a shared understanding, adequate communication, and building relationships with each other help support IPP in schools. The utilization of a relationship-centered care approach between SLPs and CTs is also important to foster and support student outcomes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24018732.

Early childhood educators' mental state language and children's theory of mind in the preschool setting.

The study examined the presence and nature of a relationship between 13 early childhood educators' mental state language (MSL) and 77 preschool children's (3- to 5 years) Theory of Mind (ToM). Educator language samples were elicited during two naturalistic group-time contexts, wordless picture book storytelling and an instructional building task. MSL was coded according to a comprehensive scheme that captures facets of MSL content and quality. To account for well-established determinants of ToM, a range of child- and family-level factors were also measured. Results indicated no significant relationship between educator MSL during group level instruction and children's ToM in the preschool setting. Although these findings challenge the assumption that educators' MSL is important for children's ToM development, important future directions are discussed.

Co-designing a shared book reading environment at a community hub.

PURPOSE: Community hubs often provide support to families in areas of high vulnerability and can provide unique opportunities for delivering early literacy programs. This study used a co-design process to engage families, staff, and community partners within a community hub to design an environment that supported shared book reading. METHOD: Co-design was enacted in four phases: 1) interviews to understand user experiences relating to shared book reading; 2) focus groups to refine ideas into actions to support shared book reading and prioritise these actions; 3) implementation of changes; and 4) understanding of participants' experiences of involvement. RESULT: Participant identified changes were implemented within four categories: 1) changing how books are organised, 2) showing families how to share books, 3) giving families information about how books can be borrowed, and 4) running more activities about books. Participants indicated they enjoyed being a part of a co-design process to affect change at the community hub. CONCLUSION: Co-design enabled the development of collaborative changes to support book reading that were valued and owned by families, staff, and community partners. Community hubs can provide unique opportunities to engage with families in areas of vulnerability to support the development of early language and literacy skills.

What do speech-language pathologists do to support families' active involvement in early intervention? Exploring moment-to-moment interactions in sessions.

PURPOSE: There is growing emphasis on the importance of involving families in all aspects of the early speech-language pathology intervention process, however, both speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and families have reported that this can be challenging. To better understand how SLPs work together with families in intervention, this study aimed to (a) explore what SLPs do to support families to be actively involved in intervention, both inside and outside sessions, and (b) explore the perspectives of families regarding how SLPs supported their active involvement. METHOD: Video-reflexive ethnography (VRE) was used to explore engagement with 21 matched SLP-family dyads in early intervention services. Up to three intervention appointments for each participating family were video recorded. Short video segments were selected and played to participants in individual semi-structured interviews where participants were invited to reflect on the interactions captured (i.e. "video-reflexive sessions"). Interview data were analysed using template analysis. RESULT: Participants reported that SLPs supported families to be actively involved in sessions by (1) planning to involve families; (2) setting expectations; (3) modelling and teaching strategies; (4) inviting families to "have a go"; (5) providing feedback; and (6) problem solving together. Participants also reported that families were supported to be involved outside sessions when SLPs: (1) got them to practice in sessions; (2) made home practice achievable and provided resources; (3) asked about home practice; (4) linked home practice to progress; and (5) helped other family members get involved. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide an explicit understanding of how SLPs can support families to take an active role in early intervention, and support the importance of a reflective and individualised approach to supporting engagement.

Families' and professionals' perspectives of building and maintaining engagement in telepractice early intervention for young children with communication disability.

PURPOSE: To explore and describe families' and professionals' perspectives about building and maintaining engagement in telepractice early intervention (EI). METHODS: Individual semi-structured reflexive interviews were conducted with Australian families of young children with communication disability receiving telepractice EI and their treating professionals. These interviews were conducted within one day of a telepractice EI session and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of 72 interviews resulted in five themes that emphasised collaboration as an overarching enabler of engagement. The themes were: (1) the delivery of family-centred telepractice was essential for engaging children and families; (2) engagement in telepractice was variable and was affected by child, parent and professional factors; (3) engagement was an investment that required time, consistency and technology; (4) maximising communication interactions during telepractice sessions encouraged children and families to engage with professionals; and (5) joint planning and preparation facilitated child and family engagement in telepractice. CONCLUSIONS: In the midst of the current COVID-19 pandemic, the present study shed light that in many ways, engagement in in-person and telepractice intervention is similar. However, the findings revealed the importance of families having an active role in telepractice EI sessions that occur in the family's social and communication environment.Implications for RehabilitationFamily engagement and high levels of parent participation are recommended in family-centred early intervention (EI).In EI delivered via telepractice, families and professionals invest in engagement-building and collaboration in a similar manner to in-person EI and in line with the principles of family-centred practice.The distinctiveness of telepractice engagement includes professionals being conscious of their communication style, taking advantage of the home environment, communicating inside and outside appointments, and jointly planning with parents/primary carers.EI professionals and students who work with young children with communication disability via telepractice can benefit by considering the engagement-building strategies described in the present study.

Exploring engagement in telepractice early intervention for young children with developmental disability and their families: a qualitative systematic review.

PURPOSE: This review aimed to (1) describe the nature of engagement in telepractice early intervention (EI) for families of young children with developmental disabilities; and (2) identify major barriers and facilitators for developing and maintaining engagement via telepractice. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was conducted, searching systematically across six databases (i.e., PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus). The search identified 14 studies which met the inclusion criteria of peer-reviewed studies exploring EI professionals', families', managers', or service's views of engagement in telepractice EI using qualitative methodologies. The studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and data were analysed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: The synthesised data were grouped into four main themes reflecting the nuances of engagement in telepractice EI: (1) children and family engagement is facilitated and enhanced during telepractice interaction; (2) engagement may enhance therapy outcomes through telepractice multidisciplinary collaboration and communication; (3) there are challenges to engagement in the telepractice environment; and (4) preparation in telepractice can improve the development of engagement. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comprehensive characterisation of engagement and describes a set of conceptual recommendations for establishing and maintaining engagement when using telepractice in EI.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONBuilding and maintaining engagement with families of young children with developmental disability/delay through telepractice is feasible.Despite some similarities between in-person and telepractice engagement, there are certain unique features of telepractice engagement that professionals and families may need to consider while providing/receiving early intervention services remotely.Preparation and training on how to engage in telepractice is recommended for professionals and families of young children with developmental disability/delay.Understanding how professionals and families engage with one another during telepractice interactions may improve targeted child and family intervention outcomes.

Using an Online Tool to Apply a Person-Centred Approach in Audiological Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study.

This study aimed to explore the experiences of adult clients with hearing loss and their audiologists in using an online tool, the Living Well Tool (LWT), during initial audiology appointments. The LWT is designed to help clients identify when and where it is most important for them to communicate effectively and live well with hearing loss. A total of 24 adult clients with hearing loss and two audiologists participated in this study. Clients were invited to complete the LWT prior to their next audiology appointment, however, most clients chose to use the LWT in-session with their audiologist. Following the appointment, clients and audiologists participated in individual qualitative semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences of using the LWT, and the extent to which the LWT facilitated person-centred care. Qualitative analysis five key themes which reflected participants' experiences and perceptions of using the LWT: (1) the LWT enhances audiological care; (2) the LWT supports person-centred audiological care; (3) the use of the LWT should be individualised; (4) users value comprehensiveness; and (5) users value accessibility. This study demonstrated that the LWT supported the provision of person-centred audiological care, providing a flexible, comprehensive and accessible means for audiologists to gain an understanding of their clients' needs and preferences. However, it was also noted that the use of a tool must be individualised and accessible for all.

A Qualitative Investigation of Clients, Significant Others, and Clinicians' Experiences of Using Wireless Microphone Systems to Manage Hearing Impairment.

This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of adults with hearing impairment (HI), their significant others (SOs), and clinicians regarding the use and provision of wireless microphone systems (WMS). A qualitative descriptive methodology was used, with a total of 43 participants across three groups: (1) 23 adults with HI who used WMS; (2) 7 SOs of adults who used WMS; and (3) 13 clinicians who provided WMSs to adults with HI. Participants completed an individual semi-structured in-depth interview to explore their experiences, with the data analysed using thematic analysis. The analysis revealed five themes encompassing the perceptions and experiences of WMSs: (1) with experience and clear expectations, users believe that WMS can make a difference; (2) the trial and decision-making process is important; (3) clients' experiences using WMS; (4) issues with WMS and technology; and (5) users require ongoing training and support to use WMS. These findings highlight the complexities of providing and using WMS with adults with HI. However, clients, SOs, and clinicians all reported that, with appropriate experience, expectations, training, and support, WMS can make a real difference in listening and communicating in different situations. There is also an opportunity to involve SOs more throughout the rehabilitation process.

Implementation science challenges: hearing care professionals identify barriers to clinical research.

OBJECTIVES: Conducting research in clinical settings is challenging. The aim of this study was to increase our understanding of hearing care professionals' perceptions of barriers to participating in such research. DESIGN: A modified group concept mapping approach was used to gain anonymous responses from 124 hearing care professionals to the statement: "One reason why it is hard to conduct intervention research studies in my centre/practice is….". Participants were asked for reasons other than 'time' as this is universally reported as a barrier to clinical research. RESULTS: A total of 107 distinct reasons were provided by participants and these were sorted into 5 clusters: "Competing demands/pressures" (18 statements), "Not a priority for management/organisation" (14 statements), "Lack of opportunity/support" (19 statements), "Clinician's knowledge, confidence, and beliefs" (24 statements), and "Recruitment/adherence to protocols is challenging" (32 statements). Identified barriers were generally similar to those reported in other healthcare settings, with unique barriers being those associated with a fear of scrutiny and lack of trust in the "academic elite". CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the importance of researchers, clinicians, and clinic managers working together at all stages of the research process in order for clinical research to be successful.

Identifying critical behaviours for building engagement in telepractice early intervention: An international e-Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Engagement of the child, parent and professional may facilitate positive outcomes for young children with communication disorders receiving early intervention (EI) via telepractice. Despite reported positive outcomes of engagement in a family-centred model of EI, there is limited research exploring the nature engagement in the telepractice environment and guiding professionals on how to best interact with young children and their families. AIM: To identify a set of critical behaviours for building engagement in telepractice EI. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A two-round modified e-Delphi study was conducted. Participants were international experts in the field of paediatric communication disorders and telepractice EI from diverse allied health and education backgrounds. The experts used a nine-point Likert scale to rate the importance of a predetermined set of critical behaviours for building engagement in telepractice EI across three different aspects of the telepractice interaction: (1) getting to know each other; (2) family-centred telepractice; and (3) telepractice specific considerations. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A total of 30 experts completed round 1, with 21 participants from round 1 completing round 2 (70% response rate). Across the two rounds, a total of 64 of the 109 items presented (58.71%) achieved consensus as critical behaviours for building engagement in telepractice EI. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The present study identified a set of individual aspects of the telepractice interaction that participants, particularly professionals, may need to intentionally address to engage with families of young children with communication disorders receiving EI via telepractice. The results from this study will contribute to the development of an observational tool to measure engagement in the telepractice EI environment. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject A growing body of research suggests telepractice is a feasible alternative for families of young children with communication disorders who lack access to high-quality EI. The engagement of families through family-centred care has long been recommended for children enrolled in EI. Although there is growing uptake of telepractice EI, limited research is available guiding professionals on how to engage with families of young children with communication disorders via telepractice. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study provides a set of 64 telepractice-specific behaviours deemed critical to engagement for all participants of the telepractice interaction. The display of these behaviours could assist professionals to better engage with families of young children within the telepractice environment. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings of this study provide a set of telepractice-specific behaviours that professionals may need to deliberately display and encourage while interacting with young children with communication disorders and their families. Professionals displaying these behaviours could potentially enhance the engagement of families receiving EI services via telepractice. This set of critical behaviours will be refined with the aim of developing an evidence-based observational tool to measure engagement in the context of telepractice EI.

Minimum Data Set for Families of Children With Hearing Loss: An eDelphi Study.

PURPOSE: Assessing the unique needs of each family following the diagnosis of a hearing loss is central to the delivery of family-centered hearing health care. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a Minimum Data Set (MDS) that could be used in the design of a needs assessment tool for families of children with hearing loss transitioning to early intervention. METHOD: A list of potential items for the MDS was prepared. In a two-round electronic Delphi study in Australia, hearing researchers (N = 15 in Round 1; N = 9 in Round 2), clinicians, and professionals working in early intervention for children with hearing loss (N = 85) were asked to review the potential items and to rate the importance of items using a Likert scale. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 32 main items to be included in the MDS across six categories, including informational support (13 items), professional support (five items), peer support (one item), skills and knowledge (seven items), financial support (three items), and methods of information provision (three items). Eight optional items that could be considered for inclusion in the MDS were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed MDS could support hearing professionals in identifying families' needs in order to provide individualized information and support. Future research is needed to conduct a pilot study to evaluate the needs assessment tool in terms of usability, feasibility, and therapeutic effects.

Audiologists' perspectives on management of mild bilateral hearing loss in infants and young children.

OBJECTIVE: Universal newborn hearing screening programs have led to early identification of infants with congenital mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL). The current lack of evidence-based protocols to guide audiological management of infants with MBHL has led to clinical equipoise about fitting of hearing aids. The purpose of this study was to increase understanding about the perspectives of paediatric audiologists on factors influencing their management of MBHLin infants and young children. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive research methodology involving semi-structured interviews with audiologists. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-three paediatric audiologists in diagnostic and rehabilitation settings in Victoria, Australia. RESULTS: Three main themes that influenced management were identified. These include: (1) evidence, or the lack of it, influences audiologists' practice; (2) audiologists recognise the need to be fluid; and (3) family characteristics and parents' perspectives. "Audiologists delivering family-centred practice" was identified as an overarching theme across these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Audiologists recognised the importance of adopting a family-centred approach in their management of MBHL in infants and young children. Embodied in their practice was the acknowledgement of limited evidence, the consideration of multiple child and family factors, and the incorporation of perspectives of parents and families in adopting a fluid approach to provide individualised services.

How Can eHealth Meet the Hearing and Communication Needs of Adults With Hearing Impairment and their Significant Others? A Group Concept Mapping Study.

OBJECTIVES: To seek the perspectives of key stakeholders regarding: (1) how eHealth could help meet the hearing and communication needs of adults with hearing impairment and their significant others; and (2) how helpful each aspect of eHealth would be to key stakeholders personally. DESIGN: Group concept mapping, a mixed-methods participatory research method, was used to seek the perspectives of key stakeholders: adults with hearing impairment (n = 39), significant others (n = 28), and hearing care professionals (n = 56). All participants completed a short online survey before completing one or more of the following activities: brainstorming, sorting, and rating. Brainstorming required participants to generate ideas in response to the focus prompt, "One way I would like to use information and communication technologies to address the hearing and communication needs of adults with hearing loss and their family and friends is to…." The sorting task required participants to sort all statements into groups that made sense to them. Finally, the rating task required participants to rate each of the statements according to "How helpful would this idea be to you?" using a 5-point Likert scale. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to the "sorting" data to develop a cluster map using the Concept Systems software. The "rating" data were subsequently analyzed at a cluster level and an individual-item level using descriptive statistics. Differences in cluster ratings between stakeholder groups were examined using Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Overall, 123 statements were generated by participants in response to the focus prompt and were included in subsequent analyses. Based on the "sorting" data and hierarchical cluster analysis, a seven-cluster map was deemed to be the best representation of the data. Three key themes emerged from the data, including using eHealth to (1) Educate and Involve Others; (2) Support Aural Rehabilitation; and (3) Educate About and Demonstrate the Impacts of Hearing Impairment and Benefits of Hearing Rehabilitation. Overall median rating scores for each cluster ranged from 3.97 (educate and involve significant others) to 3.44 (empower adults with hearing impairment to manage their hearing impairment from home). CONCLUSIONS: These research findings demonstrate the broad range of clinical applications of eHealth that have the capacity to support the implementation of patient- and family-centered hearing care, with self-directed educational tools and resources typically being rated as most helpful. Therefore, eHealth appears to be a viable option for enabling a more biopsychosocial approach to hearing healthcare and educating and involving significant others in the hearing rehabilitation process without adding more pressure on clinical time. More research is needed to inform the subsequent development of eHealth interventions, and it is recommended that health behavior change theory be adhered to for such interventions.

Speech language pathologists' responses to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems.

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the reported responses of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for children with complex communication needs.Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 16 SLPs who worked with children with complex communication needs. Interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis.Results: Four themes describing SLPs' responses were identified: (1) SLPs work with families; (2) SLPs respect families' wishes; (3) SLPs "push ahead" with AAC irrespective of families' wishes; and (4) SLPs reflect and acknowledge emotions.Conclusions: SLPs varied in the degree to which they remained family-centred and utilised clinical reflection following the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for the children they worked with. SLPs also described experiencing a range of negative emotions following the rejection or abandonment of an AAC system, which could impact upon ongoing client care.Implications for RehabilitationIn this research SLPs reported variability in the degree to which they remained family-centred following the rejection or abandonment of an AAC system for the children they worked with.SLPs should reflect on their emotional responses to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems by their clients.This research suggests that SLP services should consider monitoring the reflective practices of their clinicians to ensure ongoing clinical development and optimisation of client care.

"When that understanding is there, you work much better together": the role of family in audiological rehabilitation for older adults.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of adults with hearing impairment and family members regarding the role of family in audiological rehabilitation. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive methodology was used. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 37 people participated, 24 older adults with hearing impairment and 13 family members (11 spouses and 2 adult children). Four focus group interviews were conducted with the adults with hearing impairment, and 3 with family members. RESULTS: Five key themes emerged from analysis of the transcripts: (1) knowledge and understanding of hearing impairment and treatment; (2) the role of family members in rehabilitation is complex and multifaceted; (3) audiologists have an influential role in facilitating family member involvement; (4) the role of communication in rehabilitation; and (5) outcomes of family member involvement. Importantly, although perceptions were generally very positive, there was some uncertainty about the role of family. CONCLUSIONS: Audiologists have a key role in facilitating family involvement in audiological rehabilitation that is identified by adults with hearing impairment and their families. Although participants reported limited involvement in audiological rehabilitation currently, they identified potential for involvement in areas such as goal setting and decision-making.

Does a simulation-based learning programme assist with the development of speech-language pathology students' clinical skills in stuttering management?

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based learning can be used in university programmes to provide speech-language pathology students with essential clinical experiences. However, limited research has explored the use of simulation to support students' development of skills in clinical practice with people who stutter. AIMS: (1) To evaluate students' clinical skills in managing stuttering within a simulation-based learning programme; (2) to develop an assessment tool, the Standardised Patient Interview Rating Scale for Stuttering (SPIRS-Stuttering); and (3) to conduct a preliminary investigation of its validity in measuring students' performance. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Speech-language pathology students (n = 114) participated in a simulation-based stuttering programme in addition to academic coursework in fluency disorders. Students' clinical skills were assessed over two simulation sessions using the SPIRS-Stuttering tool, adapted from an earlier iteration of the SPIRS tool. Content validity, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the SPIRS-Stuttering tool were also explored. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Students demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in stuttering clinical skills between sessions 1 and 4 of the simulation-based stuttering programme. Good content validity was achieved for the SPIRS-Stuttering tool with a low level of intra-rater reliability and variable internal consistency. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This study identified that students' clinical skills in stuttering improved during participation in a simulation-based programme undertaken in conjunction with an academic course on fluency disorders. The results of this study support the inclusion of this learning modality in university programme curricula. Whilst the SPIRS-Stuttering tool enabled assessment of speech-language pathology students' clinical skills in stuttering management, further exploration of reliability is required. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Within speech-language pathology, simulation-based learning is a teaching approach used in university clinical programme curricula. Simulation-based learning is used as an opportunity for students to gain specific clinical skills, particularly if clinical experiences are readily not available. Research in speech-language pathology has revealed that students value simulation because it provides a safe learning environment. What this study adds to existing knowledge There are fewer opportunities for students to gain clinical experience in the management of stuttering in adults. This study explored students' clinical skill development within a stuttering simulation-based learning programme. Additionally, it detailed the development and preliminary investigation of validity of the SPIRS-Stuttering, an assessment tool used in a simulation-based learning environment. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Students' clinical skills in the assessment and management of stuttering in adults, as measured by the SPIRS-Stuttering, improved during participation in the stuttering simulation-based learning programme. Further investigation of validity of the SPIRS-Stuttering tool is required to confidently measure students' performance. The stuttering simulation-based learning programme can be used to provide students with an opportunity to develop their clinical skills in stuttering, a practice area in speech-language pathology that is not always available to students.

Speech-language pathology students' perceptions of simulation-based learning experiences in stuttering.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that some speech-language pathologists are uncomfortable treating people who stutter. Accessing quality clinical education experiences in stuttering is difficult given the ongoing rise in students enrolled in speech-language pathology programmes and the limited number of stuttering-specific placements available. Simulation-based learning is a viable option for providing speech-language pathology students with practical experience in a safe learning environment. Whilst research has found that simulation-based learning experiences in stuttering assist in the development of students' clinical skills, students' perceptions of participating in stuttering simulation-based learning are yet to be explored. AIMS: To investigate speech-language pathology students' comfort, anxiety, knowledge and confidence in the management of stuttering at the commencement of an academic stuttering course and before and following participation in a stuttering simulation-based learning programme. METHODS & PROCEDURES: This study used a cross-sectional survey design. Participants were 105 undergraduate and graduate entry masters speech-language pathology students enrolled at an Australian university. Students engaged in a stuttering simulation-based learning programme embedded within an existing academic course on the management of stuttering. A purposefully developed survey was administered at three time points: pre-course (T1), pre-simulation (T2) and post-simulation (T3) in order to explore students' comfort and anxiety levels, and perceptions of their knowledge and confidence in stuttering management. Descriptive statistics were used to report the medians and range of students' responses. Changes across all time points and between each of the time points were determined using the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test, respectively. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed on all matched survey items (n = 96) across all time points. Between each time point, a significant difference in students' perceived knowledge levels was found with small to large effect sizes. However, there was no difference in students' perceived comfort and anxiety levels between the time points of pre-course and pre-simulation. Open-ended responses on the post-simulation survey revealed that students valued learning about stuttering within a simulation-based learning environment. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Simulation-based learning experience in stuttering management was valued by students. When accompanied by theoretical content, participation in a stuttering simulation-based learning programme supported students to feel more comfortable and less anxious about working with people who stutter. This finding has implications for the development of clinical skills in the assessment and treatment of adults who stutter. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Simulation is a teaching approach used within speech-language pathology to support the development of students' clinical skills. Simulation provides a safe learning environment for students, an opportunity for repeated practice and is valued by students. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study explored students' perceptions of their comfort, anxiety, knowledge and confidence in working with people who stutter before and following participation in a simulation-based learning programme. It describes a stuttering simulation-based learning programme that can be embedded into speech-language pathology programme curricula. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The stuttering simulation-based learning programme detailed in this study can be applied and embedded in speech-language pathology curricula. It can be used to support the development of students' confidence in the assessment and management of stuttering.

Setting a prioritized agenda to drive speech-language therapy research in health.

BACKGROUND: Prioritized research agendas are viewed internationally as an important method for ensuring that health research meets actual areas of clinical need. There is growing evidence for speech-language therapy-prioritized research agendas, particularly in disorder-specific areas. However, there are few general research priority agendas to guide speech-language therapy research. AIMS: To collaboratively develop a prioritized research agenda for an Australian public health context with clinical speech-language therapists (SLTs), academic SLTs and consumers of speech-language therapy services. METHODS & PROCEDURES: An initial stimulus list of potential research areas for prioritization was collected from SLTs via an online survey. Two categories (service delivery and expanded scope of practice) were selected from this list for prioritization due to their relevance across multiple health services. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to develop a prioritized research agenda for each of the two categories. One NGT session was conducted with each of the three participant groups (clinical SLTs, academic SLTs, consumers) for each category (total NGT sessions = six). The prioritization data for each group within each category were summed to give a single, ranked prioritized research agenda for each category. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Two prioritized research agendas were developed. Within each agenda, SLTs and consumers prioritized a need for more research in areas related to specific practice areas (e.g., Alternative and Augmentative Communication, Communication Partner Training), as well as broader professional issues (e.g., telehealth, working with culturally and linguistically diverse families). CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The current findings support the need for funding proposals and targeted projects that address these identified areas of need. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Evidence-based practice is a critical component of SLT practice. There is often a disconnect between the research evidence generated and areas of clinical need, and in some areas a lack of evidence. Prioritized research agendas can help drive research in areas of clinical need. What this paper adds to existing knowledge A collaborative, prioritized SLT research agenda was developed using the NGT according to the views of clinical SLTs, academic SLTs and consumers of speech-language therapy services in a conglomerate of public health services. SLTs and consumers identified a need for further research in specific areas of SLT practice as well as broader emerging professional issues What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Targeted research projects funded on a large scale are required to address these identified areas of need. Other health services around the world could replicate this prioritization process to drive research in areas of clinical need.